Something Broke in Dhaka
Let's get this out in the open—India and Bangladesh used to be like old college friends. Sure, they squabbled over the TV remote. Topics included Teesta water, border fences, and cattle smuggling. But their memories went deep. They were liberation war buddies, economic partners, even cultural cousins. And then—bam. August 2024. The news coming out of Dhaka read like the script from a political thriller. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina faced down weeks of boiling student protests. She received a not-so-gentle nudge from the army. She then resigned and fled to India. Just like that. Executive power replaced. Airspace drama. Emergency meetings in New Delhi. The sort of stuff that makes democracies sweat and neighbors freeze stock panes on their TV screens.
From the moment Hasina's motorcade scurried across the border, India's neighborhood strategy has been in shambles. Bangladesh's new regime—interim, military-blessed, “stabilizing” (insert nervous cough)—wants Hasina back. India says no extradition (so far). The street-level anger in both capitals simmers into anti-India demonstrations. These escalations lead to tit-for-tat diplomatic pranks.
And honestly? From a purely human angle—it's all pretty tragic.
From Chai to Chopsticks: The China Pivot
While India and Bangladesh trade barbed statements and emotional ultimatums, another player is slipping into the frame: China. You can hear the murmurs in Delhi's think tanks and Dhaka's newsrooms. The new caretaker government is led by Muhammad Yunus, an economist-turned-fixer. They did not book their first foreign policy flight to New Delhi. Nope, they landed in Beijing. A political emoji, if ever there was one.
Did China roll out the red carpet? More like paved a highway. $2.1 billion in new investments—including a shiny Chinese Industrial Economic Zone. Loans for ports. Infrastructure contracts. Trade deals big enough to make Western diplomats squint. There is strategic cooperation on the “defense industrial base.” Plans are underway for smart ports and new railway lines. There are also the photo ops and the Belt and Road flourishes. Additionally, there are carefully-phrased mutual respect statements. Yunus, eager to stabilize an economy wobbling on foreign currency fumes, grabs every yuan he can.
My opinion (and you can disagree): this is less about Dhaka becoming a full-on Chinese vassal. It's more about Bangladeshi survival tactics. Smarter to hopscotch the rivalry and squeeze maximum mileage from both giants—a classic “swing state” move. Still, if I were an Indian policy planner, I would be worried about Chinese engineers measuring river depths. They are doing this just across the Siliguri Corridor. This corridor is that skinny, chicken-neck bit that could choke off Northeast India if the worst ever happens.
Geography is destiny. Or a curse.
India surrounds Bangladesh on almost all sides. That proximity, historically, has been both promise and peril: easy for trade. Easy for infiltration. Easy for resentments to spill out. After Hasina's fall, old anxieties roar back: border killings flare between BSF and Bangladesh border guards, Hindu minorities are suddenly at higher risk, and illegal migration accusations stack up. Trade is pinched. India cancels certain trans-shipment facilities, stoking new economic headaches in the garment sector—Bangladesh's lifeline. Circle of trust, this is not.
The truth? Both countries could lose. If relations tank, regional schemes—SAARC, BIMSTEC, BBIN—become so much paperwork in a drawer. Rivers dry up, border fences crack down, and everyone is left counting losses. And the real wild card: China's shadow looms larger. It is ready to offer money and concrete in ways New Delhi cannot. At least not with current budgets and bureaucratic crawl. If the “great South Asia decoupling” completes, it is not inconceivable that regional cooperation dies for a decade. Possible? Yes. Inevitable? No, but let us not sugarcoat how fraught it has gotten.
(Mini Tangent): How Did We Get Here?
History haunts this dynamic. Bangladesh—formerly East Pakistan, liberated with India's essential help in 1971. Hasina, daughter of the nation's founder, had been Delhi's most reliable friend in decades. Her authoritarian streak? Ugly, yes—but she kept Islamists at bay, protected minorities (mostly), gave India leverage... up to a point. The student-led revolution was not anti-India per se, but since the dust has settled, anti-India sentiment has spiked. Convenient scapegoat? Maybe. But also a symptom of just how fragile these “friendships” can be when regime change blows through.
The Future: A Slow-Burning Standoff, or Something Worse?
Where do we go from here? The optimists say: Yonusean pragmatism will eventually bring Dhaka and Delhi back to the table. They have, after all, managed plenty of crises. Water sharing fights. Terror crackdowns. Even prisoner swaps. But this rupture feels different. Hasina, sitting in an Indian safe house; Students in Dhaka burning Indian flags. New power brokers in Dhaka cultivating not just China, but a surprisingly warm secret channel to Pakistan—Bangladesh's old adversary. Old scripts tossed, new alliances scribbled in pencil.
My take: India has, for the moment, “lost” Bangladesh. Not in the sense of forever, but in the sharp, wounded way of a friendship suddenly soured. Will Delhi win Dhaka back? Maybe. But in the meantime—China's banquet table is set, and Bangladesh is pulling up a chair.
Food for Thought—Or, Your Turn at the Table
So, is this the start of a new South Asian cold war? Or just political musical chairs, soon to be reshuffled and forgotten? Imagine you are a policymaker in New Delhi or Dhaka—what would you do differently? Is it time for big regional reconciliations, or has the rivalry gotten too personal, too tangled?
Let's talk—I am curious, are you hopeful or worried?
(Inspired by recent coverage in The Diplomat, Hindustan Times, DW, BusinessToday, CENJOWS, and others. For more, see The Washington Times, People's Daily, and relevant Bangladesh-India relations news.)
Post a Comment