On September 17, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia signed a landmark mutual defense agreement in Riyadh. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Army Chief General Asim Munir both attended the ceremony, underscoring its importance. The deal is straightforward: aggression against one will be treated as aggression against both.
Yet the deeper meaning lies not in the text but in its interpretation—something many Indian analysts and global commentators appear to have misunderstood.
(This article is based on an analysis from this YouTube video.)
Why the Timing Matters
On the very same day, retired General Khalid Kidwai—senior adviser to Pakistan’s National Command Authority—held a press conference in Islamabad. He made two major disclosures:
-
Pakistan’s claim on Rafales: Kidwai revealed that during the first night of Operation Shindur, Pakistan’s Air Force shot down seven Indian fighter jets, including four Rafales. For the first time, tail numbers of the downed aircraft were shared publicly.
-
Rocket Force Command: He also confirmed the raising of Pakistan’s Army Rocket Force, adding a new layer of conventional deterrence that raises the nuclear threshold.
Both disclosures were clear signals: this agreement is about conventional military capabilities, not nuclear weapons.
Trump’s Quiet Dependence on Pakistan
Another piece of the puzzle: General Asim Munir’s lunch with President Trump at the White House on June 18.
Why was Pakistan’s army chief invited? Because Trump needs assessments from a trusted partner in a region where Israel often drives U.S. policy beyond his control. To avoid being cornered, Trump sought Pakistan’s military input—especially regarding Iran.
To institutionalize this channel, Trump appointed Sergei Gore as U.S. Ambassador to Delhi with an additional role as Special Envoy for South and Central Asia, giving him the freedom to consult Pakistani leadership directly.
Where China Fits In
China has no troops or bases in the Middle East. Instead, Beijing has played a stabilizing role—facilitating reconciliation between Iran and Saudi Arabia, and even hosting Palestinian factions.
For Washington, China is not a competitor in Middle Eastern security, only in technology and trade. That is why both the U.S. and China can live with Pakistan deepening its security role alongside Saudi Arabia.
Why Riyadh Needed This Pact
Saudi Arabia is racing toward Vision 2030, preparing for a post-oil economy. Yet security remains its greatest vulnerability. After Israel’s June 13 attack on Iran, Riyadh realized that U.S. guarantees could no longer be relied upon.
Pakistan was the natural choice for a partner. For decades, Pakistani forces have trained Saudi troops and airmen. What was informal cooperation is now codified in a defense pact.
Three Key Interpretations
-
Not Nuclear: Despite speculation, this is not about a Pakistani nuclear umbrella. It is about credible conventional deterrence.
-
No Threat to India-Saudi Ties: Both Chinese and Pakistani scholars at the recent Beijing Xiangshan Forum stressed they want normal relations with India. This pact does not undermine India’s relationship with Riyadh.
-
Agreement vs. Treaty: Some argue it’s “just” an agreement. But when both sides want results, the legal form matters little. Saudi Arabia even briefed Iran about the deal, and Tehran raised no objections.
Who Gains?
-
Saudi Arabia: strengthened deterrence.
-
Pakistan: recognition as a credible military power after Operation Shindur.
-
United States: indirect stability without direct intervention.
-
China: a more stable environment for trade and investment.
-
Iran: reassured through diplomatic channels.
In the end, this agreement is not directed against India, nor is it about nuclear blackmail. It is the product of Pakistan’s demonstrated military performance and Saudi Arabia’s search for reliable security in a turbulent region.
Comments
Post a Comment