“If Israel has it, why can’t we?”
It's the unspoken rage behind so many late-night debates in cafes from Cairo to Karachi. A nuclear weapon isn't just about war—it's about dignity, deterrence, and defiance.
For decades, the idea of a Muslim nuclear bloc has danced on the edges of geopolitics. But outside of Pakistan, no Muslim-majority country has crossed the threshold. And it's not for lack of trying.
Do you ever wonder why it's so hard?
Iran: The Nuclear Pariah
If there's one nation that almost made it, it's Iran.
After the 1979 revolution, Iran saw nuclear energy—and eventually, nuclear weapons—as a hedge against Western bullying and regional isolation. Israel had nukes. The US had troops next door. Saddam had invaded them once. They weren't going to be caught without defense again.
But here's what happened:
The IAEA and UN sanctions strangled Iran's economy.
The JCPOA (2015) deal gave them a temporary reprieve, but Trump's withdrawal reignited tensions.
Covert sabotage, cyberattacks (like Stuxnet), and Israeli assassinations targeted their scientists.
Iran's program is alive—but always just short of the finish line. Some say that's exactly how Tehran wants it: nuclear ambiguity without the bomb.
Libya: Gaddafi's Short-Lived Dream
In the 1990s, Muammar Gaddafi secretly pursued a nuclear program with help from AQ Khan's infamous proliferation network.
But after the 2003 Iraq invasion, he made a deal with the West:
Give up the nuke program in exchange for legitimacy and security.
It didn't end well.
Gaddafi was overthrown and killed in 2011 during a NATO-backed uprising.
Ever since, some Muslim leaders have whispered: “If he had the bomb, would Libya still be standing?”
Saudi Arabia: Rich, Paranoid, and Patient
Riyadh doesn't have a nuclear program—yet. But it's shopping.
Crown Prince MBS has openly said: “If Iran gets a nuclear bomb, we will follow suit as soon as possible.”
Saudi Arabia has invested heavily in nuclear energy, built research reactors, and inked deals with China and Pakistan.
Some suspect it may try to buy a bomb off-the-shelf, possibly from Pakistan.
But here's the snag:
Saudi Arabia hasn't signed onto IAEA's Additional Protocol, which raises red flags.
The US doesn't trust it enough to hand over enrichment technology.
Pakistan, wary of global scrutiny after AQ Khan, is keeping its distance—at least officially.
Egypt: The Quiet Aspirant
Egypt started its nuclear program way back in the 1950s. But wars with Israel, economic collapse, and shifting alliances derailed it.
Today:
Cairo flirts with Russia for nuclear power plants.
It publicly supports a nuclear-free Middle East, although quietly resents Israel's unchecked arsenal.
But Egypt's path to nukes is blocked by instability, economic dependency, and its US military aid package—$1.3 billion a year.
You don't bite the hand that feeds your generals.
What's Holding Them Back?
Building a bomb isn't just about uranium. It takes:
Time (decades)
Money (billions)
Secrecy (and luck avoiding spies)
Delivery systems (missiles, planes)
Political will (and willingness to be a pariah)
And the world watches Muslim harder nations. After AQ Khan's proliferation network got exposed, Pakistan faced international humiliation. Since then, any whisper of a nuclear program from a Muslim country sets off global alarms.
Final Thought: The Bomb as Mirage
For many Muslim nations, the bomb represents more than a weapon. It's a symbol—a shortcut to sovereignty, respect, and survival.
But maybe that's the illusion.
Because in the end, a nuclear arsenal can't fix broken economies, divided societies, or political corruption. It won't stop drone strikes or cyber wars or sectarian bloodshed.
And if history is any guide—it might bring more enemies than allies.
Then again, maybe some leaders already know that. Maybe chasing the bomb is more about theater than reality.
Post a Comment