Behind the bold numbers lies a harder truth — peace is not a spreadsheet, and borders do not obey promises.
When a Twitter commentator claimed that “Pakistan’s Afghanistan campaign will cut terrorism by 82 percent in 24 months and generate $40 billion in economic activity,” it caught fire. The post made rounds in political circles and WhatsApp groups. It was bold, patriotic — and wildly optimistic.
Still, it tapped into a yearning every Pakistani knows: the hope that one decisive policy could finally bring order to our western frontier.
The Promise
Supporters of the government’s latest campaign — the deportation of undocumented Afghan nationals and renewed military operations in border regions — say the results will be transformative.
They talk of secure borders, reopened trade routes, millions of new jobs, and foreign investors flocking back. The logic is simple: if terrorism drops, confidence returns. Peace is profitable.
It sounds neat. But reality rarely follows a PowerPoint slide.
The Numbers Don’t Add Up
Let’s start with that “82 percent drop in terrorism.” No credible data model predicts that kind of fall in two years.
Since the Taliban’s takeover of Kabul in 2021, Pakistan has seen a surge in militant attacks — many traced to the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) sheltering inside Afghanistan.
For violence to collapse so dramatically, three conditions would have to align:
-
The Afghan Taliban fully cooperate in dismantling TTP camps.
-
Pakistan’s fencing, surveillance, and policing become airtight.
-
Economic stability reduces extremist recruitment.
None of these boxes are fully ticked.
The Economic Mirage
The $40 billion figure makes headlines but not sense.
Pakistan’s annual trade with Afghanistan is under $2 billion.
Even ambitious regional projects — TAPI gas, CASA-1000 power, Central Asia corridors — would only yield around $10–15 billion in activity if everything went perfectly.
To touch $40 billion, Pakistan would need a regional economic boom that rewrites the map of South and Central Asia. That takes decades, not 24 months.
Jobs, Confidence, and the Long Game
Claiming two million jobs is no less fanciful. Between 2018 and 2023, Pakistan’s entire industrial sector created around 1.2 million jobs.
Security gains help business sentiment — yes — but jobs depend on manufacturing revival, credit flows, and energy prices.
What is plausible is a return of investor confidence.
After the Zarb-e-Azb campaign in 2014–2016, terror incidents fell roughly 45 percent, and FDI briefly ticked up.
If the current policy stabilizes the frontier and avoids humanitarian backlash, it could restore some credibility. But confidence is a fragile currency. It fades with every power cut, every policy U-turn.
The Real Dividends
Peace, if sustained, changes everything — school attendance, tourism, small business, even how late shops stay open in Peshawar.
But peace is not a line item; it’s a habit a country must relearn.
A fence can slow a smuggler, not an ideology.
A deportation drive can shift headlines, not history.
To truly earn those “dividends,” Pakistan needs an Afghanistan policy rooted in cooperation, not coercion.
Because the richest peace is not forced by borders — it is negotiated through trust.
Closing Line:
Peace will indeed prove profitable — but only when we stop treating it like an investment scheme and start treating it like a shared responsibility.
Post a Comment