Posts

Showing posts from October, 2025

Justice Has No Flag: Why War Crimes Are War Crimes — No Matter Who Commits Them

 After my last piece on October 7, someone left a comment that stopped me mid-scroll. “It takes being a real human to write something like this,” they said. Then they added something I’ve been thinking about ever since: “Hamas attacking soldiers and taking POWs are not war crimes. All civilian killings are potential war crimes. Targeting civilians and taking civilian hostages is absolutely a war crime. Hamas definitely committed war crimes on Oct. 7. Israel has been committing war crimes since 1948. That does not justify Hamas committing war crimes. Which also means that Israel has no justification for committing war crimes after Oct. 7. Those crimes include attacking anyone inside Gaza, as it is Israeli-occupied territory.” That comment said, in a few tight lines, what whole conferences and TV panels have failed to say: that justice cannot wear a uniform. The Law of the Unequal I have spent the past year watching a strange inversion unfold. The side that speaks of resist...

Who Rules the World When No One Is Wise? The Ethical Vacuum Behind the U.S.–China Rivalry

 It began with that awkward handshake — Trump smiling too wide, Xi standing still. I watched it on my laptop one evening while the ceiling fan in Karachi hummed and the city lights flickered after another power cut. In Munich, my daughter Fareha texted that they were keeping the heating low again. Baby Salar was asleep in his cot wearing a wool cap, though it was only October. She joked, “Baba, we live like monks with a mortgage.” The handshake was supposed to calm markets. But what it really showed was a planet run by men who mistake showmanship for wisdom. Maybe Fareha is right. Maybe we are governed by algorithms, not adults. When the Courts End at the Border Inside countries we still pretend there are limits — laws, courts, the idea of justice. But between nations, no such thing exists. There is no referee, no father to say “enough.” Trade wars, sanctions, embargoes — they are modern words for the oldest game of domination. A few months ago, I overheard a trader in Bolto...

Faith, Finance, and Silence: How the West Lost Its Moral Voice on Israel

 A reader once commented under one of my articles that money and government are to society what blood and nerves are to the human body. I stopped at that line. It sounded strange, almost poetic, but it carried a truth. Because if power in the West moves like blood and nerves, its pulse is not moral conviction. It is circulation — of money, faith, and memory. One night in Karachi, the power went out during the news. The screen froze on an image from Gaza: an ambulance light flashing red across a dark road. The generator hadn’t started yet. Outside, the call to prayer floated through the night air. I remember sitting in that half-darkness thinking how silence often feels more deliberate than noise. The comment had gone on to say that the West no longer has a center — no Rome, no London, no Washington — just a network of banks, media, and diplomacy holding it together. An empire without borders. That phrase stayed with me because it describes the way moral power now functions: diff...

Why Fewer International Students Are Choosing America — and Turning to Germany Instead

 AI Generated Report  The report that the number of international students arriving in the U.S. in August fell by nearly 20% AP News +1 has broad and significant implications—both for U.S. higher-education institutions and for the wider U.S. labour market. I’ll break down the key impacts, then highlight some longer-term risks and opportunities. Implications for U.S. Institutions Budgetary strain International students often pay full tuition (or higher tuition) and are not eligible for many U.S. federal financial-aid schemes. AP News +1 A drop of ~20% in arrivals suggests fewer tuition-paying students from abroad, meaning revenue-shortfalls for many colleges and universities. Especially acute for institutions that have built budgets assuming a certain intake of international students—programs, staffing, campus housing, research support may be impacted. This in turn might force domestic students to face higher tuition increases, or campuses to cut programs. ...

Key Donor Countries Supporting Ukraine (as of 2025)

Several countries have led in providing financial and military aid to Ukraine since 2022. The United States is the single largest contributor (about €114.6 billion committed by mid-2025). European allies collectively have also given substantial support – notably EU institutions (€21.3 billion) and the United Kingdom (€13.6 billion) despite constitutional limits on military support. France has likewise been a key donor (several billion euros in military equipment, financial loans and humanitarian aid) in support of Ukraine. Below we summarize each of these countries’ current economic conditions in 2025, using key indicators and recent analyses. United States 🇺🇸 GDP Growth: The U.S. economy has shown moderate growth. Real GDP is projected to rise about 2.0% in 2025, after a period of strong post-pandemic performance. The IMF notes that the U.S. “has turned in a strong performance” with activity and employment exceeding pre-pandemic trends. Inflation: After peaking in 2022, inflation in...

Sinwar, Trauma, and the Lessons the Middle East Refuses to Learn

  It began with a reader’s question that lingered longer than the post itself. “Did those perpetrators grow up with an oppression myth?” he asked. I had written about Yahya Sinwar, often called the butcher of Khan Yunis by his critics, trying to understand what shapes such a mind. The reader reminded me that suffering does not always create monsters. Sometimes it builds moral memory. Jews remember the ghettos, the camps, and the silence of the world. Yet they do not blow up buses in Munich. They built museums instead of militias. The pain of extermination was turned into vigilance and remembrance, not revenge. In much of the Muslim world, the opposite happened. Our stories of loss were not healed; they were inherited as anger. The rhetoric of humiliation became the air our children breathed. The “oppression myth,” once rooted in truth, hardened into ideology. It became a tool for leaders who found power in grievance. Sinwar is only one symptom. Behind him stands a generation r...

We Were Freed, Not Healed

  The Empire drew our borders. We are still bleeding along them. I grew up hearing stories about a man I met only as a baby. My grandfather lived in India. He never came to Pakistan. My father never got a visa to see him. They wrote letters that took weeks to cross the border, each one folded around more longing than words could hold. When I was born, my grandfather came for a short visit. For ten months he played with me, held me, called me by a name I don’t remember. My mother says he cried when the train began to move, his hand still waving through the smoke as we left. I was a baby in my mother’s arms, too young to understand what separation meant. He was an old man who had already lived through Partition. Maybe he knew the border had taken something from him he would never get back. The Loot That Built Empires History books turn theft into trade. For two centuries, colonial powers drained our land, our labor, our strength. They took gold, cotton, and wheat. They called it prog...

Stop Trying to Be an AI Expert. Be Its Translator.

Every office I know is chasing the same thing — the next trick to “master” AI. Better prompts, smarter phrasing, secret hacks. There’s a quiet race happening in every corner of the corporate world: who can talk to ChatGPT or Claude or Gemini like a wizard. But here’s the truth. Most of what people are learning today about “prompt engineering” will be useless next year. The interfaces are getting simpler, not harder. The machines are learning to understand us. It’s the humans who need to learn to understand them. The Skill We’re Missing We don’t need more AI users. We need AI translators. People who can take an AI’s polished paragraph or confusing summary and explain it clearly, in plain human language, to a client, a manager, or a team that doesn’t live on prompt-crafting Reddit. Every office now has a few people who can “get the AI to write an email” or “summarize a report.” But when that summary is vague, biased, or half-wrong, who notices? Who explains that to the boss? That’s the t...

No, Elon Musk Is Not the Dajjāl

No, Elon Musk Is Not the Dajjāl Why these rumours spread — and what the hadiths really say In WhatsApp groups and late-night YouTube sermons, a story is making the rounds. Elon Musk, the tech billionaire who wants to colonize Mars, is being called Al-Masīh ad-Dajjāl — the False Messiah foretold in Islamic tradition. Screenshots of hadiths, shaky translations, and edited clips of Musk talking about brain chips or humanoid robots are offered as “proof.” But step back for a moment. Are these claims rooted in any sahīh (authentic) hadith? Or are we watching another example of how fear, technology, and religion collide in the digital age? What the authentic hadiths actually say The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) described Dajjāl in several rigorously authenticated narrations: He will be a human man, blind in one eye, with the word kāfir written between his eyes. He will emerge from the East, between Syria and Iraq. His era will last forty days — one like a year, one like a month, one ...

Germany’s Invisible Riders: How Delivery Apps Exploit the Immigrant Workforce Behind the Wheels

  As Lieferando and Uber Eats turn to subcontracted fleets, immigrant couriers face layoffs, legal gray zones, and the quiet erosion of worker rights in Europe’s “fair labor” capital. Outside Berlin’s Ostbahnhof, the air smells of drizzle and exhaust. Dozens of riders stand together, their orange and green backpacks lined like small flags of defiance. Someone plays music on a phone. Another rider holds up a cardboard sign that reads, We are not machines. They are protesting layoffs. But that word feels too small. What they are really fighting is a new system that has quietly rewritten what a job means in Germany’s gig economy. The hidden switch For years, delivery apps such as Lieferando , Uber Eats , and Flink hired riders directly. Contracts were simple: the platform was the employer. Riders received pay slips, social insurance, and a little security. That changed when the companies began using “fleets” —small subcontractor firms that take over the hiring. On paper, the ...

Was the European Parliament Infiltrated by Russian Agents?

The question sounds like a Cold War echo, yet it refuses to fade. Over the past year, quiet investigations inside Brussels have revived an old anxiety: how far has Russia’s intelligence network reached into European politics? It began as whispers. An aide linked to a Member of the European Parliament was said to be passing sensitive political documents to intermediaries connected with Moscow. No formal charges yet, but enough for committees to pause, to check access logs, to wonder who sits beside them in those glass-walled offices. European security experts believe the method is not new. Russia’s Federal Security Service, the FSB, works through influence rather than open recruitment. Former officials describe a slow approach — social gatherings, cultural forums, invitations to speak on “peace and dialogue.” One step at a time, contacts become friendships, and friendships become channels. Nothing dramatic, just steady pressure on the seams of trust that hold institutions togethe...

Ukraine’s Courage Is Endless. Its Ammunition Isn’t.

Ukraine’s army has no shortage of courage. That much the world has seen. Soldiers who once worked in offices or drove taxis now crawl through mud under drone fire. They have held lines no one believed could be held. Kyiv still stands. Kharkiv was taken back. Kherson was liberated. Courage is not in doubt. The question is how long they can carry on this war. The Will Is There For almost three years, Ukraine’s soldiers have fought a stronger enemy with smaller numbers. They have done it through grit, improvisation, and a sense that if they stop fighting, their country disappears. That kind of motivation does not fade easily. It comes from something deeper than orders or pay. When Russian missiles hit apartment blocks in Dnipro or Odesa, new volunteers still show up. Families send food to the front. Mechanics turn pickup trucks into combat vehicles. Teachers, software engineers, and retired officers all keep the war effort alive. Still, courage does not refill ammunition crates. The Limit...

Why Success Abroad Isn’t “Slave Pride”: The Truth About Indian Talent and H-1B Migration

  I read a comment that said, “They become CEOs because they’re obedient to their masters. It’s a servant culture. All this pride is just a slave’s pride.” It made me stop. Not because it was new, but because it was familiar. I’ve heard versions of this before, sometimes whispered with jealousy, sometimes with anger. But always built on the same misunderstanding of what migration, success, and dignity really mean. The Stereotype of Obedience There’s this idea that Indian or South Asian professionals rise in global corporations because they are obedient. As if success comes from quietly following orders rather than from thinking, solving, and leading. But obedience doesn’t make anyone the head of a trillion-dollar company. It doesn’t rebuild Microsoft or steer Google through antitrust storms. People like Satya Nadella or Sundar Pichai didn’t get there because they bowed the deepest. They got there because they learned to lead across cultures, manage teams across time zones, an...

Europe Wants Its Gold Back — and Its Trust, Too

    It begins in silence, deep beneath the streets of Manhattan. Somewhere under the Federal Reserve, pallets of gold bars rest behind steel and stone, each one tagged with a foreign flag. For decades, they’ve been symbols of trust — the kind that doesn’t need words, only weight. But trust, like currency, loses value when the world changes. The Quiet Repatriation In recent years, Germany, the Netherlands, Austria, and even smaller economies such as Hungary and Belgium have requested the return of their national gold reserves from American and British vaults. Germany began moving 674 tonnes from New York and Paris in 2013, completing it ahead of schedule in 2017. The Netherlands repatriated over 120 tonnes from the U.S. in 2014. Austria and Poland followed, citing “geopolitical uncertainty.” The official line is always the same: logistical convenience , public reassurance , strategic diversification . But between the lines, it reads like doubt. Trust Lost in ...

Pakistan’s 2025 Digital Law: Compatibility with Qur’an and Sunnah? Pakistan’s Constitution and Islamic Law: The Constitution of Pakistan (1973) embeds Islamic principles in its very foundation. The Objectives Resolution – made part of the Constitution’s preamble – declares that sovereignty belongs to Allah and that Muslims shall be enabled to live according to the teachings of the Qur’an and Sunnah. More concretely, Article 227 of the Constitution stipulates that all laws must conform to the injunctions of Islam and that *“no law shall be enacted which is repugnant to such injunctions”*. In practice, this means lawmakers are constitutionally bound to ensure new legislation does not contradict the Qur’an or the Sunnah (the teachings and practices of Prophet Muhammad). A Council of Islamic Ideology exists to advise on whether proposed laws align with Islamic injunctions, and a Federal Shariat Court can strike down laws found *“repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam”*. Any new law – including digital media laws – must pass this Islamic compatibility test in theory. The 2025 Digital Law (PECA Amendment): In January 2025, Pakistan’s parliament passed and President Asif Ali Zardari signed the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025 (PECA 2025) into law. This law amends the 2016 cybercrimes act, introducing sweeping new provisions to regulate online content. Notably, it criminalizes the dissemination of “fake or false” information online, with hefty penalties – up to three years imprisonment and Rs 2 million in fines for anyone who “intentionally spreads, displays, or transmits false information” that could cause “fear, panic, or unrest” in society. The amendment’s wording is broad and vaguely framed, as it does not precisely define what constitutes “fake” news. It also establishes new bodies, including a Social Media/Digital Protection Authority, empowered to remove or block online content deemed false, hateful, or *“against the ideology of Pakistan”*. The authority can require social media companies to register locally and comply with content removal orders. A special Social Media Protection Tribunal is set up to hear offenses, though critics note it is composed of government-appointed officials rather than independent judges. In essence, the 2025 PECA amendments significantly expand the government’s control over digital expression, ostensibly to curb misinformation and maintain public order. Journalists protest in Islamabad on January 28, 2025 against the PECA Amendment, calling it a “black law” that curbs freedom of speech. Many media organizations warned the law would be used to stifle dissent under the pretext of fighting “fake news.” Alignment with Qur’an and Sunnah – Supporting Arguments: On the face of it, the aims of the new digital law can be seen as consistent with certain Islamic principles. Islam strongly condemns lying, false testimony, and spreading unverified rumors that can harm others. The Qur’an explicitly instructs believers: *“O you who have believed, if a disobedient one comes to you with information, investigate, lest you harm a people out of ignorance and become regretful for what you have done”*. This verse (Qur’an 49:6) establishes the obligation to verify news and not spread misinformation. Likewise, a saying of the Prophet Muhammad warns that it is “enough falsehood for a person to repeat everything they hear”, cautioning against circulating unvetted information. From this perspective, a law that punishes the intentional spreading of falsehood and seeks to prevent public panic or disorder could be seen as upholding the Islamic ethic of truthfulness. Preventing societal turmoil caused by lies and rumors aligns with the Islamic injunction to “avoid and remove harm” from society. Moreover, Islam considers the protection of people’s honor and public order important; for example, slander and false accusations (especially false witness or accusing someone of a crime without proof) are regarded as grave sins in the Qur’an. Given these principles, one could argue that penalizing malicious disinformation – which can ruin reputations or incite harmful unrest – is not inherently un-Islamic. In fact, it serves a purpose (combatting deceit and fitna (chaos)) that Islamic law would conceptually support. The government has also framed the law as a way to uphold the “ideology of Pakistan”, which includes Islamic values, by blocking content that is anti-state or sacrilegious. Ensuring information integrity and social stability can thus be viewed as consistent with the maqāṣid al-sharī‘a (objectives of Islamic law), such as protection of honor, intellect, and public peace. Concerns over Compatibility – Dissenting View: Despite the above alignment, serious questions have been raised about the law’s compatibility with Islamic injunctions on justice and truth. Critics note that the vague definition of “false information” and the broad powers given to authorities could be misused to silence truthful criticism and dissent. Islamic teachings place great emphasis on justice, honest testimony, and speaking truth to those in power – even when it is difficult. The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said, *“Speak the truth even if it is bitter.”* In Islam, enjoining what is right and forbidding what is wrong is a duty; this includes holding rulers and institutions accountable and conveying truth in the public interest. The Qur’an commands believers to stand firm for justice and truth, *“even though it be against yourselves or your kin”*, and not to mix truth with falsehood or conceal what is true. If the new law is applied in a way that suppresses truthful speech or whistle-blowing under the guise of combating “fake news,” it would conflict with these Islamic principles. For instance, labeling genuine criticism of government or exposure of corruption as “false information” (simply because it embarrasses authorities) would amount to concealing the truth and perpetuating injustice – clearly against the Qur’anic ethos. There is a well-known saying in Islamic tradition that “the best form of jihad is to speak a word of truth in front of an oppressive ruler.” If the PECA 2025 law were used to punish people for speaking out against wrongdoing in government or society, it would impede the Islamic duty of amr bil maʿruf (promoting right) and nahy ʿanil munkar (preventing wrong). Additionally, Islam requires due process and fairness in implementing punishments; laws must not be unjust or overly discretionary. The concern with PECA 2025 is that its overbroad criteria (e.g. content causing “unrest” or offending “ideology”) grant officials wide latitude to decide what speech is illegal. Such unchecked powers can lead to ẓulm (injustice), which Islam unequivocally forbids. Any punishment under Islamic law demands clear evidence and specific definitions of offenses – the Prophet himself warned against ambiguous Hudood punishments by saying to “avoid legal punishment in cases of doubt”. If the cybercrime law’s ambiguity leads to arbitrary or unjust repression, that aspect would be incompatible with Islamic concepts of justice. Constitutional Oversight and Current Status: It is important to note that, so far, no court or Islamic advisory body in Pakistan has officially struck down the PECA 2025 amendment on Islamic grounds. The law was primarily challenged by journalists and civil society on the basis of fundamental rights (freedom of expression) rather than an explicit Qur’an/Sunnah violation. The Council of Islamic Ideology was reportedly not consulted before passage. However, given the constitutional mandate, the law could be reviewed if a petition claimed it contravenes Islamic injunctions. Under Article 227 and related provisions, if any citizen or group believes a law is “repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam”, they may seek advice from the Council of Islamic Ideology or a ruling from the Shariat Court. For instance, a law that gagged legitimate truth-telling could be argued to violate Qur’anic commands of honesty and justice. Whether PECA 2025 crosses that line is debatable and would hinge on how it is enforced. Its text does not overtly mandate anything like forbidding prayer, usury, or other clear-cut haram acts; rather, the contention is about potential abuse of a generally permissible aim (curbing lies) to achieve impermissible ends (muzzling truth and dissent). The Pakistani government defended the amendment as targeting only “fake and false news” and not silencing true journalism. In theory, punishing falsehood and protecting the public from chaos is Sharia-compliant, but persecuting the innocent or truthful would violate Sharia. This fine line will likely determine the Islamic legitimacy of the law. Conclusion: Under Pakistan’s constitutional framework, no law can violate the Qur’an and Sunnah, and the new digital law must be measured against this standard. In principle, the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act 2025 does not obviously contradict any specific injunction of Islam – its stated intent to curb misinformation, slander, and societal discord can be seen as upholding Islamic values of truthfulness and public order. However, the implementation of this law is crucial. If applied narrowly and fairly to punish malicious liars who spread harmful falsehoods, it would likely be compatible with the Qur’an and Sunnah – since Islam has no tolerance for those who spread lies and harm the community. On the other hand, if the law’s ambiguous provisions are used to infringe on justice, suppress valid criticism, or conceal the truth, then it would contradict fundamental Islamic teachings that encourage honest counsel, accountability, and justice in governance. In short, there is nothing inherently un-Islamic about outlawing fake news, but injustice and oppression carried out in the name of this law would certainly be un-Islamic. As with any law in Pakistan, PECA 2025 remains subject to review under the Constitution’s Islamic clauses. Moving forward, it may require refinement (e.g. clearer definitions and safeguards against misuse) to fully satisfy both the constitutional requirement and the higher principles of Sharia. The balance between curbing falsehood and upholding truth/justice must be carefully maintained to ensure the law truly adheres to the spirit of the Qur’an and Sunnah, as mandated by Pakistan’s founders. Sources: Constitution of Pakistan 1973, Article 227 (Islamic Provisions) Dawn (Pakistani newspaper) – report on PECA Amendment 2025 passage and content Human Rights Watch – “Pakistan: Repeal Amendment to Draconian Cyber Law” (Feb 2025) Amnesty International – press release on PECA Amendment (Jan 2025) The Express Tribune – news report on President Zardari signing PECA 2025 and its provisions Reuters News – “Pakistani journalists rally against law regulating social media” (Jan 28, 2025) Yaqeen Institute – “Misinformation and Islamic Ethics” (2024) – discusses Islam’s stance on lying and verifying news Islamicity.org – “Speaking Truth to Power” – quotes Qur’an and Hadith on truth and justice.

  Pakistan’s 2025 Digital Law: Compatibility with Qur’an and Sunnah? Pakistan’s Constitution and Islamic Law: The Constitution of Pakistan (1973) embeds Islamic principles in its very foundation. The Objectives Resolution – made part of the Constitution’s preamble – declares that sovereignty belongs to Allah and that Muslims shall be enabled to live according to the teachings of the Qur’an and Sunnah. More concretely, Article 227 of the Constitution stipulates that all laws must conform to the injunctions of Islam and that *“no law shall be enacted which is repugnant to such injunctions”*. In practice, this means lawmakers are constitutionally bound to ensure new legislation does not contradict the Qur’an or the Sunnah (the teachings and practices of Prophet Muhammad). A Council of Islamic Ideology exists to advise on whether proposed laws align with Islamic injunctions, and a Federal Shariat Court can strike down laws found *“repugnant to the Injunctions of Islam”*. Any new la...