The End of Selective Justice: A New Era for Universal Jurisdiction

 

​History is often a one-way mirror where the powerful observe the weak but remains shielded from their own reflections. For decades, the International Criminal Court appeared to be a tool designed specifically for African despots and Asian autocrats. Karim Khan, the Chief Prosecutor of the ICC, recently revealed a staggering conversation with a Western leader who claimed the court was built only for "thugs like Putin" and not for "Western friends." Does the law only exist to discipline the defeated?



​The Credible Foundation of Universal Jurisdiction and War Crimes

​The principle of Universal Jurisdiction and War Crimes prosecution suggests that certain atrocities are so heinous they transcend national borders. Currently, nearly 140 states recognize the authority of international courts, with 19 actively exercising this right. From the 2008 "Operation Cast Lead" in Gaza to recent filings against Israeli officials in Germany and Brazil, the legal landscape is shifting. The Hind Rajab Foundation recently petitioned a German court to investigate former officials under these exact humanitarian laws; it is no longer just a theory but a functional mechanism of global accountability.

​The Hunter Becomes the Hunted

​The narrative of international law is currently undergoing a radical transformation. Consider the "Nazi hunters" like Simon Wiesenthal, who spent a lifetime tracking war criminals to ensure they never slept soundly. Today, the world witnesses a similar pursuit, but the targets have changed. We see human rights lawyers and activists following military officials across borders; they wait for a single vacation or a diplomatic trip to serve a summons.

​The law is like a slow-moving glacier: it is cold, indifferent, and eventually crushing. While the UN Security Council remains paralyzed by the veto power of the elite, the "small fishes" of the legal world are beginning to catch the "big fishes" through domestic courts in Italy, France, and the UK. The avoidance of accountability is becoming increasingly difficult as digital evidence from social media replaces the hidden ledgers of the past.

​A Necessary Reckoning

​We are witnessing the birth of a more objective global order. It is no longer enough to claim "civilized" status while endorsing the collective punishment of civilian populations. If a twenty-year-old commits a crime, the law views him as a criminal until he is ninety, or until justice is served. Is it not time we applied this same standard to the architects of modern warfare? The pursuit of justice must be blind to nationality; otherwise, it is merely a theater of the powerful.

0/Post a Comment/Comments