The number of executions conducted by Saudi Arabia this year has exceeded 100, according to the rights group Amnesty.
No, executions alone cannot prevent crimes. There is no evidence to suggest that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than other punishments, such as life imprisonment. In fact, some studies have shown that the death penalty may actually increase crime rates.
There are a number of reasons why executions may not deter crime. First, people who are considering committing crimes are often not thinking about the consequences of their actions. They may be motivated by anger, desperation, or mental illness, and they may not be thinking about the possibility of being executed.
Second, the death penalty is often carried out after a long delay, which can make it seem less immediate and less effective as a deterrent. By the time someone is executed, they may have already served many years in prison, and they may have lost touch with the outside world.
Third, the death penalty is often used in a discriminatory way. In many countries, people who are poor, minority, or mentally ill are more likely to be executed than others. This can send the message that the death penalty is not a fair punishment, and it can undermine its effectiveness as a deterrent.
There are a number of other factors that can help to prevent crime, such as:
- Effective law enforcement
- Good social programs
- Strong economic opportunities
- Education and job training
- Mental health care
- Community support
These factors can help to address the root causes of crime, such as poverty, unemployment, and social alienation. They can also help to create a more just and equitable society, which can make people less likely to commit crimes.
The death penalty is a complex issue with no easy answers. However, there is no evidence to suggest that it is an effective way to prevent crime. There are a number of other factors that are more likely to be effective, and these should be the focus of our efforts to make our societies safer.