The Forgotten Middlemen: How Elites Broke Palestine Before the Wars Began

 History has a way of flattening people.

Heroes here. Villains there.
Everyone else disappears in the dust.

When we talk about early Arab–Jewish conflict in Ottoman Palestine, the story usually collapses into a binary. Zionists arrived. Palestinians suffered. End of sentence. But there’s a missing layer in that account, one that makes people uncomfortable because it complicates moral clarity.

The peasants didn’t just lose their land.
They were sold out.

The Land Was Sold Far From the Fields

By the late nineteenth century, much of the land in Ottoman Palestine was not owned by the people who worked it. Peasants lived on it, farmed it, buried their dead in it, but the paperwork lived elsewhere. Beirut. Damascus. Istanbul.

When Zionist buyers arrived with European capital, they didn’t knock on peasant doors. They negotiated with absentee landlords who had never bent their backs in those fields. The transactions were legal. Profitable. Clean on paper.

On the ground, they were catastrophic.

Villagers were evicted from land they had cultivated for generations. Not because they had failed. Not because they had rebelled. But because someone else, far away, decided cash mattered more than continuity.

This is the first betrayal that rarely gets named.

Exploitation Isn’t New. Permanence Is.

Here’s where the argument usually fractures.

Some respond by saying: this proves Zionism wasn’t uniquely responsible. Arab elites exploited peasants long before Jewish immigration. True. Exploitation was baked into the Ottoman land system. Class hierarchy wasn’t imported from Europe.

But exploitation and replacement are not the same thing.

What changed was not that peasants lost land. That had happened before. What changed was that they lost any path back into the economy that replaced them.

Zionist institutions, particularly the Jewish National Fund, enforced policies of exclusive Jewish ownership and Hebrew-only labor. This wasn’t incidental. It was ideological. The goal was not coexistence within an existing system, but the construction of a separate one.

A peasant displaced by a local landlord might find work elsewhere. A peasant displaced by a closed national economy finds a wall.

That difference matters.

Nationalism Met Class Betrayal. The Collision Was Inevitable.

Arab elites failed their peasants. That is undeniable.
Zionist settlers pursued a nationalist project that required exclusion. That is also undeniable.

The conflict didn’t erupt because one side was evil and the other innocent. It erupted because elite decisions hardened into irreversible structures.

Arab landlords monetized land without accountability. Zionist institutions transformed ownership into destiny. Between them stood peasants who had no vote, no capital, and no future in either vision.

By the time Arab nationalism awakened fully, the ground had already shifted beneath it. Resistance came late because dispossession came quietly.

That’s not ancient hatred. That’s modern politics doing what it always does best: hurting those with the least leverage.

The Pattern Didn’t End. It Repeated.

This is where history bleeds into the present.

Arab regimes today speak passionately about Palestinian suffering. Yet many deny Palestinians citizenship, limit employment, restrict movement, and treat refugeehood as a permanent identity rather than a crisis to resolve.

The rhetoric is loud.
The integration is minimal.

It’s the same structure wearing new clothes. Vulnerable people turned into symbols. Elites insulated from consequences. Moral language replacing material responsibility.

Pointing this out does not absolve Israel of historical or ongoing injustice. It simply refuses to let Arab leadership off the hook by hiding behind slogans.

Two failures can coexist. In fact, in Palestine, they always have.

History Isn’t a Courtroom

The mistake is treating history like a trial where only one verdict is allowed.

What happened in Ottoman Palestine was not a single crime. It was a chain reaction. Absentee ownership. Nationalist exclusivity. Imperial collapse. Competing futures forced onto the same soil.

The peasants didn’t lose because they picked the wrong side.
They lost because no side was built for them.

Until we’re willing to say that out loud, we’ll keep recycling moral arguments that feel righteous but explain very little.

And maybe that’s the real inheritance of that era.
Not just land lost.
But responsibility endlessly deferred.

Whose Land Was Palestine? History Refuses Simple Answers

 

People love clean slogans. “Palestine is Arab land.” “Jews were always there.” But the truth is older, messier, and layered with too many footprints to fit into one banner.

---

A Land of Many Names and Masters

Before Islam, Palestine was already a crossroads. Canaanites, Israelites, Babylonians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Byzantines — each ruled and left their imprint. Jews built temples, Christians raised churches, and locals prayed in Aramaic long before Arabic came.

So when we ask “was Palestine an Arab land?” the answer depends on when we are looking. By the 7th century, yes, it became largely Arab in culture and language. But before that, it was a patchwork of faiths and peoples, layered like the stones of Jerusalem itself.

---

Why Arabs Conquered It

In 636 CE, Muslim armies under Caliph Umar defeated the Byzantines at Yarmouk. Jerusalem soon surrendered. This was not about Palestine alone. It was part of a larger expansion, where Islam spread on the ruins of two exhausted empires: Rome’s Byzantines and Persia’s Sassanids.

The Arab tribes did not invent conquest. They joined a long line of powers who claimed the land before them. But they brought something lasting — Arabic language, Islamic law, and a sense of belonging that still defines the region.

---

What About the Jews of Medina and Khaybar?

Long before, inside Arabia itself, Jewish tribes lived in Medina (then Yathrib) and Khaybar. They farmed, owned land, grew dates, and signed treaties with the Prophet Muhammad. But alliances cracked.

• Banu Qaynuqa and Banu Nadir were expelled after disputes.

• Banu Qurayza, accused of siding with enemies in wartime, faced execution.

• In Khaybar, Jews surrendered in 628 CE but stayed on as tenant farmers, giving Muslims half the harvest. Eventually Caliph Umar expelled them entirely.

Yes, they owned land. Yes, they lost it. Conquest in the 7th century was not polite.

---

The Trouble With Labels

So when people say “Palestine is Arab land,” they mean it became Arab after the Islamic conquest and stayed that way for centuries. But others point to the Jewish presence before, or the Christian Byzantines, or even older civilizations. Everyone has a piece of the story.

Think of a Palestinian farmer in Gaza today, standing by a patch of dry soil near Rafah where tomatoes barely grow. His grandfather once had an orchard in Jaffa, filled with citrus trees. The keys to that old house still hang in his family’s living room, though the house itself is gone.

Now think of a Jewish family in Tel Aviv, telling their children how their grandmother walked barefoot out of Lodz after the Holocaust. For them, Israel is not a conquest but a refuge — the only place they believe will not turn them away.

Both hold memory like it is property. Both say, “This land is ours.”

---

My Thought

It seems dangerous when modern politics tries to reduce this history into one-line slogans. Both Arabs and Jews can point to centuries of roots. Both can point to centuries of displacement. And when we forget the layers, we end up shouting past each other instead of learning why the soil feels sacred to so many.

Maybe the only honest answer is this: Palestine has always been many people’s land, which is why it keeps breaking hearts.