Showing posts with label Qatar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Qatar. Show all posts

After Qatar, Could Saudi or UAE Be Next?

 

Israel’s strike on Qatar — a country that hosts the largest U.S. base in the Middle East — has shaken more than Doha’s sense of security. Across the Gulf, leaders in Riyadh and Abu Dhabi are asking the same chilling question: if America did not protect Qatar, what happens if we are targeted next?


Saudi Arabia’s Expensive Weakness

Saudi Arabia has spent more than $450 billion on defense in the last decade, buying F-15s, Patriot batteries, and advanced missiles. Yet its military track record is poor. The Houthis in Yemen struck deep inside the kingdom with drones, crippling oil facilities in Abqaiq in 2019. Washington offered sympathy, not protection.

Now, after Qatar, the uncomfortable truth is unavoidable: money does not equal safety if the protector is unwilling.

Human angle (Parents & Families): A young father in Riyadh who works in the oil sector admitted to friends, “We can buy planes and tanks, but will they save my children if missiles fall on the city?”


The UAE’s Vulnerable Ambition

The UAE has positioned itself as a mini superpower — projecting influence in Yemen, Libya, and Africa, while hosting American, French, and even South Korean forces on its soil. Abu Dhabi believed this web of alliances made it untouchable.

But Qatar’s experience shows otherwise. If Israel feels emboldened, the UAE’s glass towers in Dubai and Abu Dhabi suddenly look like fragile targets.

Human angle (Trades & Workers): Filipino and Indian expat workers in Dubai construction camps shared whispers after the Qatar strike: “If it can happen there, why not here?” Their livelihoods depend on stability, but their fear is raw.


America’s Awkward Silence

The Biden administration has so far avoided framing the Qatar attack as a violation of U.S. security guarantees. But that silence is noticed. For Arab leaders, the Qatar case is not just about Israel. It is about America’s willingness to risk confrontation with Israel to protect its Arab partners — a willingness that now looks doubtful.

Human angle (Echoes in Karachi): In Karachi, a cousin of a Saudi migrant worker asked, “If America won’t stand up for Qatar with its biggest base, why would it defend Saudi Arabia?” This sentiment spreads fast across diasporas.


Could They Be Next?

The honest answer: yes, Saudi Arabia or the UAE could be next. Not because Israel plans open war with them, but because the precedent has been set. Each time Israel pushes and Washington holds back, the line of acceptable action moves further.

For Gulf rulers, the lesson is bitter. A U.S. base on your soil does not guarantee protection. At best, it guarantees America’s interests — and those may not align with yours.

What could be the consequences of stripping Qatar of its major no nATO ally status?

The discussion around stripping Qatar of its major non-NATO ally (MNNA) status and imposing sanctions on Al Jazeera involves complex geopolitical considerations, reflecting both strategic alliances and media influence. Here's an overview based on the information available up to September 2024: - **Qatar's MNNA Status**: Qatar was designated as a major non-NATO ally by the United States, which provides benefits in defense trade and security cooperation. This status was seen as enhancing U.S.-Qatar relations, particularly in military cooperation, as evidenced by joint military exercises and the strategic importance of Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar for U.S. operations in the Middle East. - **Criticism and Legislative Moves**: There has been legislative action in the U.S., with bills introduced to review or potentially revoke Qatar's MNNA status due to allegations of support for Hamas. Critics argue that Qatar's role in mediating conflicts, particularly with its financial support to Gaza and its relationship with Hamas, might undermine U.S. interests or security. - **Al Jazeera's Role**: Al Jazeera, funded by Qatar, has been criticized for its coverage, particularly accused of anti-Israel bias and incitement. This criticism has led to calls for sanctions or actions against the network, with some suggesting it acts as a mouthpiece for Islamist views or even terrorist propaganda. - **Public Sentiment and Media Coverage**: X posts reflect a range of sentiments from outright criticism of Al Jazeera for perceived bias to broader geopolitical discussions on Qatar's influence through its media and financial support in the Middle East. There's a noticeable call for accountability regarding how Qatar uses its influence, especially in conflict zones like Gaza. - **Geopolitical Implications**: Stripping Qatar of its MNNA status or sanctioning Al Jazeera would have significant geopolitical repercussions. Qatar has positioned itself as a mediator in various conflicts, including the Israel-Hamas issue, which some see as a constructive role, while others view it as problematic interference. Such actions could affect not just bilateral relations but also the broader stability in the Middle East, given Qatar's role in energy markets and its strategic military partnerships. - **Strategic Considerations**: The U.S. and other allies might weigh the benefits of maintaining strong ties with Qatar due to its strategic military base, economic influence through LNG exports, and its mediation efforts against the criticisms regarding its media and political stances. Given this context, any decision to alter Qatar's MNNA status or impose sanctions on Al Jazeera would involve balancing strategic military and economic interests with ideological and security concerns. The debate reflects broader tensions between realpolitik and ideological alignments in international relations, especially in regions as volatile as the Middle East.

Women Experience Diabetes Differently Than Men

  I remember sitting in the waiting room at Civil Hospital Karachi three years ago, watching an exhausted woman in a black chador argue with...